Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04298
Original file (BC 2013 04298.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04928

			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 




APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to show he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill Education Benefits (TEB) to his dependents on 17 Aug 11.



APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He submitted his TEB application while deployed in Afghanistan, and for some unknown reason the application was not accepted.   Due to an error in his contact information, he did not receive any notification of such, and it wasn’t until early 2013 that he discovered his application had not been accepted.

He should be granted the 17 Aug 11 TEB transfer date because he met the requirements by signing the AF Form 4406, Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits Statement of Understanding, and his Department of Veteran’s Affairs (DVA) records show he transferred his educational benefits to his son in 2011.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.



STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 28 May 03, upon graduation from the United States Air Force Academy, and currently serves in the grade of major (O-4).

On 12 Mar 13, the applicant signed the Post-9/11 GI Bill TEB statement of understanding (SOU) and agreed to incur a 4-year active duty service commitment (ADSC).  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice.  The applicant contends that his contact information must have been in error, resulting in him not being notified that his TEB application was not complete (no electronic signature of the Statement of Understanding (SOU)). The DVA, the Department of Defense (DoD) and military services widely publicized the Post-9/11 GI Bill and the transferability feature.  DoD developed a special website, hosted by Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC), to facilitate the transfer of educational benefits.  The website was operational 27 Jun 09 for the purpose of accepting transfer benefits applications.  The process for applying for the TEB begins by logging into the vMPF.  The first page that pops up is the verification of member’s duty email address.  The member also has the opportunity to list a second email address and must verify all email addresses before proceeding with the application process. 

Right Now Technology (RNT) records reveal he submitted an application for the Post-9/11 GI Bill through the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) website on 17 Aug 11.  The member was sent his initial email on 18 Aug 11 directing he visit the vMPF/Self Service Actions/TEB link to determine eligibility and sign the SOU.  The applicant never made an attempt to follow through with the requirement to sign the SOU.  Without a signed SOU, the Total Force Service Center (TFSC) cannot verify that the member agrees to the four-year ADSC required with the transfer of educational benefits.  

Additionally, the DVA record (screen shot) provided by the member allegedly verifying he transferred his educational benefits to his son in 2011, shows his entitlement information, not his son’s.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C.



APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 31 Jan 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by this office.



THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.



THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.



The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04298 in Executive Session on 3 Nov 14 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 7 Oct 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 12 Dec 13, 
	            w/atchs.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Jan 14.

						



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02905

    Original file (BC-2012-02905.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial, stating, in part, that based onthe information reported in the TEB and counseling notes inRight Now Technology (RNT) by the Total Force Service Center(TFSC) personnel, the applicant was provided all instructions/requirements needed prior to the TEB applicationapproval; specifically, the requirement to sign a Statement ofUnderstanding (SOU) agreeing to the obligated service incurredfor participating in the TEB option under the Post-9/11 GI...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04592

    Original file (BC 2013 04592.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04592 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His active duty service commitment (ADSC) for his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) be changed to 21 Apr 11, instead of 30 Apr 15. On 20 May 13, more than two years after extending his enlistment for TEB, AFPC notified him that the TEB transfer did not occur because he did not sign the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03316

    Original file (BC 2013 03316.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    At the time, there was no indication of any other required steps to complete. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 10 Jul 2009, he signed a Statement of Understanding to start his four year Active Duty Service Commitment for transfer of his Post 9/11 GI Bill Educational Benefits to his dependents. Exhibit C. Letter,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04771

    Original file (BC 2013 04771.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 Bill, has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election, and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election (if applicable), may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents pursuant to Service regulations (Title 38 USC, Chapter 33, § 3319(b)(1)). If you do not receive...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05700

    Original file (BC 2013 05700.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05700 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he transferred his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits (TEB) to his dependents while on active duty. He was presented with a message on the MilConnect website indicating his transfer request would not be final until he digitally signs an Air Force Form 4460, Post 9/11 GI Bill...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01383

    Original file (BC 2014 01383.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records be corrected to show he was able to complete transfer of educational benefits (TEB) under the Post-9/11 GI Bill on 8 Aug 11, establishing an active duty service commitment (ADSC) of 7 Aug 15. When accessing the DMDC website for TEB, a message from “Your Service Component” appears, which says that the transfer request is not final until the member digitally signs the Air Force Form 4406, Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of Education Benefits Statement of Understanding, and if members...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02517

    Original file (BC 2013 02517.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He registered for the Post 9/11 GI Bill and Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) in Nov 2009 but unfortunately, was not aware he was required to sign a Statement of Understanding (SOU) concurring with the 4 year Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) required for TEB. Any member of the Armed Forces, active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or enlisted, on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00189

    Original file (BC 2014 00189.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Under the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) website, it notifies the applicants that their transfer request is not final until the SOU is digitally signed in the Virtual Military Personnel Flight (vMPF). On 12 Oct 10, an email was sent to the applicant informing her that her application for TEB had expired because she did not sign the SOU. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03973

    Original file (BC 2013 03973.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03973 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) for transfer of his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational benefits to his dependents be corrected to 9 Apr 2018 [sic]. Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve, officer or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03062

    Original file (BC 2013 03062.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    He submitted an application for the TEB on 13 March 2011 at which point he thought the application process was complete. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. Without the signing of an SOU there is no way the TFSC has any idea the applicant wants the obligated four year ADSC that goes along with the transfer of the benefit.